Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
2.
An. bras. dermatol ; 94(2): 147-156, Mar.-Apr. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1001140

ABSTRACT

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Occupational dermatoses are common, especially contact dermatitis. Epidemiological studies on these dermatoses are scarce in Brazil and they are necessary as part of the public policy to protect workers' health. OBJECTIVES: To identify sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with occupational contact dermatitis seen between 2000 and 2014 at an occupational dermatology service. METHODS: It is a cross-sectional and retrospective study, based on information obtained from the service's database. RESULTS: Of 560 patients with conclusive patch test, 289 (46.9%) presented occupational dermatoses and 213 occupational contact dermatitis with predominance of the allergic type in relation to the irritative type (149:64 respectively). The odds of occupational dermatoses were higher among men and lower among patients aged 50 years or older and with higher level of education. Regarding the possibility of presenting occupational allergic contact dermatitis, only the gender variable was statistically significant. The professions most seen were cleaners, construction workers, painters, mechanics/metallurgists and cooks. The commonest allergens were nickel sulfate, potassium dichromate, cobalt chloride, carba-mix and formaldehyde. STUDY LIMITATIONS: The main limitations of this study are the fact that it was carried out in a tertiary service of occupational dermatoses and the lack of access to some allergens outside the patch test baseline series. CONCLUSIONS: It was possible to identify the sociodemographic and clinical profile of patients with suspected occupational contact dermatitis seen at the Service, beyond the professional groups and allergens related to a high risk of occupational contact dermatitis in this population.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Potassium Dichromate/adverse effects , Socioeconomic Factors , Brazil/epidemiology , Patch Tests/statistics & numerical data , Caustics/adverse effects , Construction Industry , Sex Factors , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Age Factors , Dermatitis, Irritant/etiology , Dermatitis, Irritant/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Educational Status , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Irritants/adverse effects , Nickel/adverse effects
3.
An. bras. dermatol ; 94(1): 24-28, Jan.-Feb. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-983738

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Background: The fishing colony of the Picinguaba neighborhood is located at the northern end of the coast of the state of São Paulo. It has about 300 residents, of which approximately 100 are professional fishermen. Objectives: This study aimed to identify the main dermatoses of the community in comparison with other populations, and their frequency. Methods: The dermatoses were identified and tabulated for two years, in a prospective study carried out on monthly trips to the fishermen's colony in Picinguaba. Results: One hundred and eighteen patients were attended and followed up, which is equivalent to about 1/3 of the colony's inhabitants. Of these, 43 were children (under the age of 14) and 75 were adolescents and adults. The diseases observed were catalogued according to the age groups. Although most dermatoses in the community were similar with those observed in the general population, some specific cases could be seen, such as folliculitis on the legs of fishermen and an unexpected low frequency of actinic lesions in the colony, as well as dermatitis by aquatic animals. Study Limitations: The limitations were monthly attendance and the spontaneous demand of the patients. Conclusions: The finding of community-specific dermatoses and the low incidence of malignant and pre-malignant tumors associated with sun exposure needs further studies for better clarification.


Subject(s)
Humans , Animals , Male , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Young Adult , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Fisheries , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Dermatitis, Occupational/pathology , Fishes
4.
An. bras. dermatol ; 93(1): 59-62, Jan.-Feb. 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-887156

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Background: Metals are common agents of allergic contact dermatitis, occupational or not, with decreasing incidence over the last years in some countries that have regulated the amount of nickel in objects. Objectives: To analyze and compare with previous studies the profile of metal sensitization between 2003-2015. Methods: Patients who underwent patch testing between 2003-2015 were evaluated retrospectively regarding the sensitization rates to metals, the associations between them, the relationship with profession and epidemiology. Results: Of the 1,386 patients tested, 438 (32%) had positive test to some metal, similar results to the 404/1,208 (33%) of the previous study (1995-2002) performed at the same service (p=0.32). The frequency of nickel (77%), cobalt (32%) and chromium (29%) changed slightly (p=0.20). Most cases of sensitization to chromium were related to the occupation (64%), in contrast to nickel and cobalt (p<0.0001). There was a predominance of females among those sensitized to metal in both studies (p=0.63) and the age group of 20-49 years old (p=0.11); the number of fair-skinned individuals increased (p<0.001), as well as the lesions in the cephalic segment (50.5%; p<0.0001) and hands (45%; p<0.0001), which are not the most frequent location anymore. The number of cleaners decreased (39% vs. 59%; p<0.0001), which still lead in front of bricklayers/painters, which increased (14% vs. 9%; p=0.013). The frequency of wet work reduced (65% vs. 81%; p<0.0001). Study limitations: The study included a single population group; only patients with positive tests to metals were considered - the others were not evaluated for the possibility of false negatives. Conclusion: The sensitization to metals, occupational or not, has been significant over the last 21 years, with few epidemiological changes.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Allergens/adverse effects , Chromium/adverse effects , Immunization/methods , Cobalt/administration & dosage , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Nickel/adverse effects , Time Factors , Patch Tests , Retrospective Studies , Cobalt/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology
5.
An. bras. dermatol ; 93(1): 27-32, Jan.-Feb. 2018. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-887139

ABSTRACT

Abstract: Background: Occupational diseases are very prevalent in the world, especially in developing countries. Occupational dermatoses are responsible for most of these cases. However, epidemiological studies are rare in Brazil. Objectives: To verify the panorama of occupational skin diseases in Brazil describing frequencies of work-related dermatoses and their sociodemographic and occupational patterns. Methods: We used retrospective data from the Notifiable Diseases Information System, (from 2007-2014) tabulated with the Tab program for Windows - TabWin12. We used intentional non-probability sampling and sequential selection, considering all notified occupational dermatoses. Results: All cases of occupational dermatoses referred to in the period were analyzed (n = 4710). Males and the age group of 35-49 years were the most affected. The most affected body area was the upper limb (34.2%) and the hand (25.4%). The "causative agent" field in the forms was not filled in 69.4% of cases, with chrome as the most prevalent cause reported (11.8%). ICD-10 codes more prevalent were L23, L24, and L25, corresponding to 34.2% of the sample. In total, 29% of patients needed to take a sick leave. No cases evolved to death and there were 0.2% of total as permanent disability. Study limitations: The amount of missing information for various items in the system draws attention. Conclusions: Treatment of patients with occupational dermatitis include the identification and removal of the causative agent and specific treatment of the disease. Diagnosis delay in cases of occupational dermatoses brings social and financial consequences to the work and life of workers.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Demography/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Sex Distribution , Age Distribution , Disease Notification/statistics & numerical data
6.
An. bras. dermatol ; 91(6): 732-736, Nov.-Dec. 2016. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-837994

ABSTRACT

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Occupational dermatitis affects the quality of life and productivity of workers. Studies on the subject are scarce in Brazil. It is estimated that the disease is underreported and that many affected patients do not seek health care. OBJECTIVES: To conduct an epidemiological analysis of occupational dermatitis notified via SINAN in Brazil from January 2007 to December 2012; evaluate the profile of patients assisted; and check the main etiological agents involved. METHODS: We analyzed the compulsory notification forms of cases of occupational dermatitis filled nationwide during January 2007 to December 2012. RESULTS: During the study period 3027 cases of occupational dermatitis were notified in Brazil. In 61.4% of cases patients were men aged between 35-49 years (39.6%). The most described etiological agent was chromium (13.9%). The location of the body most affected was the hands, with 28.4% of cases. The construction sector is implicated in 28.7% of cases and domestic services by 18%. Allergic contact dermatitis is the most prevalent occupational dermatitis (20.6%) and the region with the highest number of notifications was the Midwest, with 376.4 cases per million inhabitants. CONCLUSIONS: The profile of patients most affected by occupational dermatitis in Brazil during the study period was: men with elementary school, aged between 20 and 49 years old and working in the construction industry. The most common occupational dermatitis were allergic contact dermatitis caused by chromium after years of exposure, being the hands and head the parts of the body most affected.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Disease Notification/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , Brazil/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Risk Factors , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Chromium/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Age Distribution
7.
An. bras. dermatol ; 91(5,supl.1): 26-28, Sept.-Oct. 2016. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-837962

ABSTRACT

Abstract Chemical leukoderma occurs due to the toxic effect of a variety of chemical agents. Mechanisms include either destruction or inhibition of melanocytes. We report two male patients (36 and 51 years old) who presented with multiple hypopigmented macules and patches on the neck, wrist, and legs after exposure to dimethyl sulfate in a chemical industry. Physical examination revealed irregular depigmentation macules with sharp edges and clear hyperpigmentation around the lesions. History of repeated exposure to a chemical agent can help the clinical diagnosis of chemical leukoderma. This diagnosis is very important for prognosis and therapeutic management of the disease.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Sulfuric Acid Esters/toxicity , Hypopigmentation/chemically induced , Hypopigmentation/pathology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/pathology , Skin/drug effects , Skin/pathology , Hyperpigmentation/chemically induced , Hyperpigmentation/pathology , Melanocytes/drug effects , Melanocytes/pathology
8.
An. bras. dermatol ; 89(3): 527-527, May-Jun/2014. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-711612

ABSTRACT

Recent reports have shown increased sensitization to Methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone. We report a retrospective study conducted at the Hospital das Clínicas - UFMG, based on the results of patch tests with the Brazilian standard series, performed on referred patients. The positive results in 359 patients from November 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed and compared with the previous data collected from March 2006 to October 2009 (447 patients). The data showed 11.14% sensitization to Methylchloroisothiazolinone/ methylisothiazolinone during 2009-2012, contrasting with the previous period (3.35%). A positive association was found between its positivity and the period of 2009-2012.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Brazil , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Patch Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Time Factors
9.
An. bras. dermatol ; 88(4): 611-613, ago. 2013. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-686530

ABSTRACT

Protein contact dermatitis is a skin condition not well known and underdiagnosed by dermatologists, resulting from an IgE-mediated allergic reaction. Clinically it presents as a chronic hand and/or forearms eczema of occupational origin, especially in professionals who work as food handlers. Epicutaneous tests are negative, and to diagnose this condition it is necessary to perform immediate-type allergy tests. The most sensitive and practical is the prick-by-prick test with food that the patient refers to cause intense itching after immediate skin contact. Treatment is symptomatic, and it is mandatory to avoid the responsible allergen, wearing plastic gloves and even sometimes leaving the workplace for symptom resolution.


A dermatite de contacto proteínica é uma condição pouco conhecida e infra-diagnosticada pelos dermatologistas, resultante de uma resposta alérgica de tipo imediato, mediada por IgE. Clinicamente apresenta-se como um eczema crónico em mãos e/ou antebraços de origem ocupacional, sobretudo em profissionais que trabalham manipulando alimentos. As provas epicutâneas são negativas e para realizar o diagnóstico desta condição há que realizar testes alérgicos de tipo imediato, sendo o mais sensível e rápido, o prick-by-prick test com os alimentos que o paciente refere causar-lhe prurido intenso e imediato ao seu contacto. O tratamento é sintomático, sendo necessário evitar o alérgeno responsável, utilizar luvas de plástico e em ocasiões abandonar o posto de trabalho para a sua resolução.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dietary Proteins/adverse effects , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Hand Dermatoses/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Food Hypersensitivity/etiology , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Skin Tests
10.
Medwave ; 13(3)abr. 2013.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-679677

ABSTRACT

La dermatitis ocupacional es una de las enfermedades ocupacionales más frecuentes en la práctica clínica. Su prevalencia varía en función de las actividades laborales y tipos de exposición, con cifras citadas en la literatura de hasta un 37 por ciento. Su origen puede ser irritativo o alérgico. Entre sus factores de riesgo se incluyen la atopía y el lavado de manos frecuente o la realización de trabajos húmedos, con evidencia controvertida para factores como el sexo, el consumo de tabaco, entre otros. El diagnóstico se basa en el examen físico, las pruebas etiológicas en parche y la certificación del origen ocupacional mediante criterios estandarizados. Se le ha asociado a disminución de la productividad laboral, ausentismo y cambios de ocupación, así como a disminuciones importantes de la calidad de vida de los pacientes. La prevención se basa fundamentalmente en la educación y la limitación de la exposición. Estas estrategias son compartidas con el tratamiento, al que se agrega el uso de fármacos como los esteroides tópicos y los inhibidores de calcineurina.


Occupational dermatitis is one of the most common occupational diseases in clinical practice. Prevalence varies according to the job activities and types of exposure, with figures of up to 37 percent reported in the literature. Its origin may be irritant or allergic. Atopy and frequent hand washing or exposure to wetness or humidity is described has been described as risk factors, while evidence for gender and tobacco consumption, among others, is controversial. Diagnosis is based on physical examination, etiological patch testing and certification of occupational origin using standardized criteria. The condition has been associated with reduced productivity, absenteeism and occupational changes, as well as significant decreases in the quality of life of patients. Prevention is based primarily on education and restriction of exposure. These strategies are coupled with the treatment, which include the use of drugs such as topical steroids and calcineurin inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Female , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/therapy , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Primary Prevention , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index
11.
An. bras. dermatol ; 87(4): 567-571, July-Aug. 2012. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-645325

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Contact dermatitis is one of the common work-related dermatoses. Among bricklayers, cement can cause both allergic contact dermatitis and primary contact irritative dermatitis. The personal protective equipment (rubber gloves) may favor the development of allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: 1) to evaluate the frequency of allergic contact dermatitis among construction workers between January 2005 and December 2009; 2) to determine the major sensitizing agents in the study group; and 3) to compare the data obtained from the construction workers to that of a group of patients who were not construction workers. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patch tests. Patients were separated into two groups: 1) bricklayers and 2) non-bricklayers. RESULTS: Of the 525 patch tests analyzed, 466 (90%) were from non-bricklayers and 53 (10%) from bricklayers. The hands were affected in 38 (61%) of them. 13 patients (24%) had irritative contact dermatitis and 40 (76%) had allergic contact dermatitis. The group of construction workers had a high frequency of sensitization to cement, and 29 (54.7%) had sensitization to rubber vulcanizing agents. 23 patients (43.4%) had sensitization to both cement and rubber. CONCLUSIONS: Among the bricklayers the presence of allergic contact dermatitis to rubber and cement in the same patient is common and demonstrates the importance of the patch test.


FUNDAMENTOS: A dermatite de contato é uma das dermatoses comumente relacionadas ao trabalho. Entre os pedreiros o cimento pode causar tanto a Dermatite Alérgica de Contato quanto a Dermatite de Contato por Irritação Primária. Os equipamentos de proteção individual (luvas de borracha) podem favorecer o desenvolvimento de Dermatite Alérgica de Contato. OBJETIVOS: 1) avaliar a freqüência de Dermatite Alérgica de Contato entre os pedreiros entre Janeiro de 2005 e Dezembro de 2009; 2) determinar os principais agentes sensibilizantes; e 3) comparar os resultados obtidos entre o grupo de pedreiros com um grupo sem pedreiros. MÉTODOS: análise retrospectiva de testes de contato. Pacientes foram separados em 2 grupos: 1) pedreiros e 2) não pedreiros. RESULTADOS: dentre os 525 testes de contato analisados, 466 (90%) eram de não pedreiros e 53 (10%) de pedreiros. As mãos foram acometidas em 38 (61%). 13 pacientes (24%) tinham Dermatite de Contato por Irritação Primária e 40 (76%) tinham Dermatite Alérgica de Contato. O grupo de pedreiros apresentou alta freqüência de sensibilização ao cimento, e 29 (54,7%) tinham sensibilização a agentes vulcanizadores da borracha. 23 pacientes (43,4%) pedreiros tinham sensibilização tanto ao cimento quanto à borracha. CONCLUSÕES: entre os pedreiros a presença de Dermatite Alérgica de Contato ao cimento e à borracha no mesmo paciente foi comum e demonstrou a importância do teste de contato.


Subject(s)
Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Construction Materials/toxicity , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Gloves, Protective/adverse effects , Construction Industry , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Retrospective Studies
12.
Yonsei Medical Journal ; : 231-235, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-145825

ABSTRACT

Trichloroethylene is commonly used as an industrial solvent and degreasing agent. The clinical features of acute and chronic intoxication with trichloroethylene are well-known and have been described in many reports, but hypersensitivity syndrome caused by trichloroethylene is rarely encountered. For managing patients with trichloroethylene hypersensitivity syndrome, avoiding trichloroethylene and initiating glucocorticoid have been generally accepted. Generally, glucocorticoid had been tapered as trichloroethylene hypersensitivity syndrome had ameliorated. However, we encountered a typical case of trichloroethylene hypersensitivity syndrome refractory to high dose glucocorticoid treatment. A 54-year-old Korean man developed jaundice, fever, red sore eyes, and generalized erythematous maculopapular rashes. A detailed history revealed occupational exposure to trichloroethylene. After starting intravenous methylprednisolone, his clinical condition improved remarkably, but we could not reduce prednisolone because his liver enzyme and total bilirubin began to rise within 2 days after reducing prednisolone under 60 mg/day. We recommended an extended admission for complete recovery, but the patient decided to leave the hospital against medical advice. The patient visited the emergency department due to pneumonia and developed asystole, which did not respond to resuscitation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Fatal Outcome , Hypersensitivity/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Solvents/toxicity , Trichloroethylene/toxicity
13.
An. bras. dermatol ; 86(5): 911-916, set.-out. 2011.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-607458

ABSTRACT

FUNDAMENTOS: Uma das causas mais frequentes de dermatite de contato alérgica, de origem ocupacional, são os aditivos da borracha, presentes nos Equipamentos de Proteção Individual. Os aditivos das luvas natural e sintética mais alergênicos são tiurams, mercaptos e carbamatos. OBJETIVO: levantar o nível de conhecimento em relação aos aditivos químicos utilizados na fabricação das luvas de borracha sintética. MÉTODOS: Foi aplicado um questionário aberto a profissionais que trabalham com fabricação, pesquisa, prescrição e comercialização das luvas. Foi adotado o método de pesquisa qualitativa. RESULTADOS: Foram entrevistadas 30 pessoas: 4 pesquisadores na área de Medicina do Trabalho, 5 médicos do Trabalho, 2 técnicos de segurança do Trabalho, 1 médico do sindicato de trabalhadores da borracha, 1 engenheiro de Segurança do Trabalho, 1 engenheira de Produção do setor de fabricação de luvas de borracha, 4 empresários importadores de luvas, 1 empresário fabricante de luvas, 3 empresários que comercializavam Equipamentos de Proteção Individual, 3 vendedores de lojas de Equipamentos de Proteção Individual, 2 empresários de lojas que comercializavam produtos para alérgicos e 3 dermatologistas. CONCLUSÃO: O conhecimento da composição química das luvas é pequeno. A rotulagem das luvas, com a descrição da composição química, facilitaria a escolha do melhor tipo de luva para cada pessoa. Esta ação, de baixo custo para as empresas, seria um ganho, do ponto de vista da saúde pública, e teria grande repercussão nos usuários de luvas de borracha.


BACKGROUNDS: One of the most frequent causes of allergic contact dermatitis of occupational origin are rubber additives, which are present in Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The most allergenic additives of natural and synthetic gloves are thiurams, carbamates and mercapto group. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the state of knowledge about the chemical additives used in the manufacture of synthetic rubber gloves. METHODS: This was a qualitative research study in which professionals working in the manufacture, research, prescription and commercialization of gloves answered an open questionnaire. RESULTS: 30 individuals were interviewed: 4 researchers in occupational medicine, 5 occupational physicians, 2 occupational safety technicians, a rubber workers' union physician, an occupational safety engineer, a pro duction engineer of rubber gloves, 4 importers of gloves, a manufacturer of gloves, 3 businessmen who sell PPE, 3 salesclerks working in stores that sell PPE, 2 businessmen who own stores that sell products for allergic indivi duals, and 3 dermatologists. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the chemical composition of rubber gloves is scant. The labeling of gloves, with the description of their chemical composition, would facilitate choosing the best type of glove for each person. This low-cost action to businesses would be a gain from the standpoint of public health, with huge repercussions for users of rubber gloves.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Gloves, Protective/adverse effects , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/immunology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Occupational/immunology , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Hand Dermatoses/immunology , Hand Dermatoses/prevention & control , Patch Tests , Rubber/chemistry , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
An. bras. dermatol ; 86(4,supl.1): 53-56, jul,-ago. 2011. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-604120

ABSTRACT

Elaioconiose é uma dermatose ocupacional do tipo acneiforme que afeta as áreas expostas de trabalhadores que lidam com óleos ou graxas. Atualmente, com o uso dos equipamentos de proteção individual, medidas de higiene pessoal e lavagem dos uniformes de trabalho, sua incidência diminuiu. Apesar de não ser uma doença rara, é pouco relatada na literatura, principalmente na nacional. Seu tratamento é lento e para a resolução das lesões, requer o afastamento do trabalhador de suas atividades laborativas.


Elaioconiosis is a work-related acneiform dermatosis which affects the exposed skin of individuals working with oils or greases. Its incidence has decreased with the introduction of personal protective equipment, personal hygiene measures and the cleaning of work clothes. Although not a rare disease, elaioconiosis is seldom reported in the literature, particularly in Brazil. Sufferers need to take time off work to proceed with the prolonged treatment to resolve the lesions caused by this condition.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Hand Dermatoses/chemically induced , Industrial Oils/toxicity , Dermatitis, Occupational/pathology , Hand Dermatoses/pathology , Sick Leave
15.
An. bras. dermatol ; 85(4): 455-459, jul.-ago. 2010. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-560575

ABSTRACT

FUNDAMENTOS: A dermatite de contato ocupacional (DCO) corresponde a 80 por cento dos casos de dermatoses relacionadas ao trabalho. OBJETIVOS: Determinar: a frequência de DCO em pacientes atendidos em ambulatório de alergia, não específico de dermatose ocupacional; o perfil dos pacientes de acordo com idade, sexo, cor, profissão, antecedentes atópicos, duração e localização da dermatose; os tipos de dermatite de contato; os principais alérgenos; e comparar as frequências dos principais sensibilizantes com os resultados obtidos em pacientes atendidos no mesmo período, sem DCO. MÉTODOS: Durante o período 2003-2006, 630 pacientes foram atendidos e submetidos à bateria padrão de testes de contato. Selecionaram-se aqueles com DCO. RESULTADOS: Sessenta e nove (10,9 por cento) pacientes apresentaram DCO. A média de idade foi de 44,5 anos. As mãos foram acometidas em 48 (70 por cento) casos. As profissões prevalentes foram do lar (27,39 por cento) e construção civil (23; 33,5 por cento). Dermatite alérgica de contato (DAC) ocorreu em 48 (70 por cento) casos, e dermatite irritativa de contato (DIC), em 21 (30 por cento). Os principais sensibilizantes foram o bicromato de potássio (28; 41 por cento), sulfato de níquel (16; 23 por cento) e carba-mix (16; 23 por cento). CONCLUSÕES: A DCO foi diagnosticada em 10,9 por cento dos pacientes, sendo mais comum na faixa etária produtiva da população. DAC esteve presente em 48 casos, provavelmente influenciada pelo longo tempo de evolução da dermatose. Os metais e os componentes da borracha foram os principais sensibilizantes.


BACKGROUND: Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) corresponds to 80 percent of the cases of skin diseases related to work. OBJECTIVES: To determine: the frequency of OCD in an ambulatory of allergy not specific for occupational dermatosis; the profile of these patients according to age, gender, color, profession, atopic history, duration and localization of the dermatosis; the diagnosed types of contact dermatitis; the main allergens and to compare the frequency of the main antigens with the results obtained from patients examined in the same period of time, without DCO. METHODS: During the three-year period from 2003 to 2006, 630 patients were examined and submitted to a battery of standardized contact patch tests and those who were diagnosed with OCD were selected. RESULTS: Sixty-nine out of the 630 patients were diagnosed with OCD. The average age was 44.5 years. Forty-eight patients (70 percentof the cases) presented the disease on the hands. The most prevalent activities of patients suffering from the disease were household tasks (39 percent) and building construction (33 percent). The allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) occurred in 48 cases which represent 70 percent of the total number of cases and irritant contact dermatitis in 21 cases corresponding to 30 percent of the total number of cases. The main allergens were potassium dichromate 28 (41 percent), nickel sulfate 16 (23 percent) and carba-mix 16 (23 percent). CONCLUSION: OCD was present in 10.9 percent of the patients. Concerning age the group in which the disease was more commonly found corresponded to the most productive group of the population. ACD corresponded to 48 cases, probably influenced by the long period of evolution of the dermatosis. Metal and rubber chemicals were the commonest allergens.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Brazil/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Patch Tests , Young Adult
16.
An. bras. dermatol ; 85(2): 137-147, mar.-abr. 2010. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-547471

ABSTRACT

Dermatose ocupacional é qualquer alteração da pele, mucosa e anexos, direta ou indiretamente causada, condicionada, mantida ou agravada por agentes presentes na atividade ocupacional ou no ambiente de trabalho. Os autores referem a importância do tema, a epidemiologia e a etiopatogenia das principais dermatoses ocupacionais: dermatites de contato irritativas e alérgicas, fitodermatites, acnes (elaioconiose e cloracne), ceratoses, cânceres, granulomas de corpo estranho, infecções, oníquias e ulcerações. A clínica da dermatose ocupacional é apresentada em diferentes profissões. Analisam-se os exames laboratoriais pedidos nessas dermatoses, com especial destaque para testes de contato, que são o padrão ouro, e fornecem-se dados do tratamento e prevenção; quanto à prevenção da dermatose ocupacional, informam-se as medidas coletivas e individuais, especialmente, no que respeita ao uso adequado dos equipamentos de proteção individual.


Occupational Dermatosis is described as any alteration in the skin, mucosa or annexes that is directly or indirectly caused, conditioned, maintained or aggravated by agents present in the occupational activity or work environment. The authors of the present study describe the importance of the topic and the epidemiology and etiopathogeny of the main forms of occupational dermatoses: allergic and irritative contact dermatitis, phytodermatitis, acne (elaioconioses and chloracne), keratosis, cancers, foreign body granuloma, infections, onychias, and ulcerations. Clinical findings of occupational dermatosis are presented in relation to various professions. Laboratory tests used to diagnose this condition are analysed, with special emphasis on patch testing, which is the gold standard. Information about the treatment and prevention of this disorder is provided. Collective and individual measures, especially regarding the proper use of individual protection equipment for the prevention of occupational dermatosis, are detailed.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dermatitis, Occupational , Dermatitis, Occupational/classification , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology
17.
An. bras. dermatol ; 84(2): 177-179, mar.-abr. 2009. ilus
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-515921

ABSTRACT

Apresenta-se o caso de uma profissional da área da saúde que desenvolveu reação de hipersensibilidade dos tipos I e IV à borracha. O quadro clínico mostrava dermatite eczematosa no dorso das mãos. O teste de contato foi positivo para o grupo tiuram, assim como o teste aberto com fragmento de luva após exposição de 20 minutos. A dosagem de IgE sérica (Rast) mostrou-se relevante. As reações aos alérgenos da borracha são frequentes entre os profissionais da saúde, devido ao contato constante com esse material.


We present a case of a healthcare professional that developed type I and IV hypersensitivity reactions to rubber. During the clinical examination the patient showed eczematous dermatitis of the hands. The patch test was positive for thiuram group and an open test with a piece of glove was positive after 20 minutes of exposure. Allergen-specific IgE test (RAST) was relevant. Reactions to rubber allergens are frequent among healthcare professionals due to constant contact with this material.


Subject(s)
Adult , Female , Humans , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/etiology , Rubber/adverse effects , Urticaria/etiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Health Personnel , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/diagnosis , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Patch Tests/methods , Urticaria/diagnosis
18.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol ; 2008 Jul-Aug; 74(4): 431
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-53197
19.
Rev. argent. dermatol ; 89(2): 82-86, abr.-jun. 2008. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-634359

ABSTRACT

Mostramos un caso de dermatosis profesional originado por plásticos (resinas epoxi) y la importancia de la detección precoz. Las resinas epoxi son de gran utilización en todo tipo de industrias (artes graficas, construcción, electrónica, componentes de prótesis traumatológicas, prótesis odontológicas, etc.) y sus componentes pueden ser causa de dermatitis de contacto irritativa y por sensibilización.


We describe a case of professional dermatosis caused by exposition to plastic products (epoxy resin) and importance of early detection. The epoxy resins are widely used in all types of industries (graphics arts, construction, electronics, traumathological and odontological prothesis, etc.) and their components may be the cause of contact dermatitis and sensitivity. Risk factors at work with epoxy resins are present during the production base resins, hardening agents, plasticizers and dilutants increase the risk of exposition at work. This requires preventive measures and early diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Epoxy Resins/poisoning , Dermatitis, Occupational/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Occupational/prevention & control , Epoxy Resins/chemistry
20.
Rev. chil. dermatol ; 20(2): 107-113, 2004. ilus
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-405250

ABSTRACT

Se presenta una revisión acabada de las patologías dermatológicas que se pueden encontrar en aquellos individuos que tocan instrumentos musicales, tanto en forma profesional como en forma recreativa, tratando de identificar los posibles factores etiopatogénicos involucrados. Se describen, además, los clásicos síndromes asociados a cada instrumento y sus características, para así poder ofrecer a estos pacientes un enfoque terapéutico más específico.


Subject(s)
Humans , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Music , Nickel/adverse effects , Cheilitis/etiology , Keratosis/etiology , Resins, Plant/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL